• Binary
    February 26, 2020 at 5:48 am #5697

    Hi all,

    I have a strange Issue:
    When I use a single select with the item lookup mode: Items From Config Option all Single Selects in the table are changing there value, when I change the value of one.

    If I switch to Item lookup mode: items From Static List, the problem is gone.

    On the screenshot “Two single selects in a table” you can see the item lookup mode: Items From Static List on the left and the Item lookup mode: Items From Config Option on the right. We are using IBM BPM Version: I could not find a fix for it in newer BAW versions.

    Is this a configuration error or a bug? I attached the configuration options for the affected single select also.

    Thank you and kind regards

    • This topic was modified 3 years, 1 month ago by Binary.
    SPARK Support
    February 26, 2020 at 12:11 pm #5701

    Hi Binary,

    I have experienced the same issue with Single Select control nested in a Table control, and have used the same work around to prevent the issue.

    Salient Process no longer develops defect fixes for the SPARK UI toolkit unless a customer has a direct support agreement.  Please feel free to reach out to our Sales Team in you are interested in getting more information about an Expert Services agreement.

    If you find the issues persists after upgrading to a newer version of BPM or BAW that includes the BPM UI toolkit, and wish to report the issue as a defect, please submit a PMR with IBM at https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/


    Stephen P.

    February 27, 2020 at 1:54 am #5703

    Thank you! I will open a PMR.

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 1 month ago by Binary.
    February 27, 2020 at 4:24 am #5706

    We found the following workaround:

    1. Transform the complex element to a new name value pair list variable.
    2. Map this variable to the static list and change item lookup mode into items From Static List.
    3. Specify the output business data.
    SPARK Support
    February 27, 2020 at 7:30 am #5709

    Hi Binary,

    That appears to be the exact pattern for the work around, as noted in earlier forum posts.  Thank you for sharing.


    Stephen P.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Start typing and press Enter to search